Spent Nuclear Fuel Dry Storage Cask Market Research Report 2033

Spent Nuclear Fuel Dry Storage Cask Market Research Report 2033

Segments - by Cask Type (Metal Casks, Concrete Casks, Dual-Purpose Casks, Others), by Storage Type (On-Site Storage, Off-Site Storage), by Material (Stainless Steel, Concrete, Others), by Application (Nuclear Power Plants, Research Reactors, Others)

https://growthmarketreports.com/Raksha
Author : Raksha Sharma
https://growthmarketreports.com/Vaibhav
Fact-checked by : V. Chandola
https://growthmarketreports.com/Shruti
Editor : Shruti Bhat

Upcoming | Report ID :EP-24 | 4.8 Rating | 37 Reviews | 281 Pages | Format : Docx PDF

Report Description


Spent Nuclear Fuel Dry Storage Cask Market Outlook

According to the latest research, the global spent nuclear fuel dry storage cask market size reached USD 1.74 billion in 2024, reflecting a robust demand for safe, long-term storage solutions for radioactive waste. The market is expected to grow at a CAGR of 5.8% from 2025 to 2033, reaching a forecasted value of USD 2.92 billion by 2033. Key growth drivers include increasing nuclear power generation, the rising need for interim storage solutions as permanent repositories face delays, and stringent regulatory mandates to ensure public and environmental safety.

The growth of the spent nuclear fuel dry storage cask market is primarily propelled by the expanding global nuclear energy sector. As countries strive to reduce carbon emissions and enhance energy security, nuclear power has emerged as a critical component of their energy mix. This has led to an increase in the generation of spent nuclear fuel, necessitating advanced storage solutions. Dry storage casks, known for their robust containment and ability to safely store high-level radioactive waste for extended periods, are increasingly being adopted as interim solutions until permanent repositories are commissioned. The ongoing decommissioning of aging nuclear reactors in North America and Europe further amplifies the demand for dry storage casks, as utilities seek to manage legacy waste in compliance with evolving safety standards.

Another significant growth factor is the evolution of cask design and material technology. Innovations in cask engineering, such as dual-purpose casks capable of both storage and transportation, and the use of high-integrity materials like stainless steel and reinforced concrete, have enhanced the safety, efficiency, and cost-effectiveness of spent fuel management. These technological advancements are not only extending the operational lifespan of storage casks but also enabling utilities to optimize storage capacity and reduce overall lifecycle costs. Additionally, the regulatory environment continues to evolve, with governments imposing stricter requirements for storage integrity, monitoring, and security. This regulatory push is compelling nuclear facility operators to invest in state-of-the-art dry storage systems that meet or exceed compliance thresholds.

The market’s growth trajectory is also shaped by the increasing prevalence of public-private partnerships and government initiatives aimed at strengthening nuclear waste management infrastructure. Several countries have implemented funding mechanisms, policy frameworks, and incentive programs to encourage the adoption of advanced dry storage casks. For example, the United States Department of Energy’s ongoing efforts to develop consolidated interim storage facilities and the European Union’s directives on radioactive waste management are fostering a favorable investment climate. Moreover, the rising focus on research reactors and the repurposing of nuclear sites for new reactors in Asia Pacific and the Middle East are creating additional demand for reliable storage solutions, further bolstering market expansion.

From a regional perspective, North America and Europe currently dominate the spent nuclear fuel dry storage cask market, accounting for a significant share of global revenue. These regions benefit from mature nuclear industries, well-established regulatory frameworks, and a high concentration of aging reactors requiring decommissioning and waste management. However, the Asia Pacific region is poised for the fastest growth due to its ambitious nuclear expansion plans, particularly in China, India, and South Korea. The Middle East is also emerging as a promising market, driven by new nuclear projects in countries like the United Arab Emirates and Saudi Arabia. Latin America and Africa, while currently representing a smaller share, are expected to witness gradual growth as nuclear power adoption increases in the coming decade.

Global Spent Nuclear Fuel Dry Storage Cask Industry Outlook

Cask Type Analysis

The spent nuclear fuel dry storage cask market is segmented by cask type into metal casks, concrete casks, dual-purpose casks, and others, each offering distinct advantages and catering to specific operational needs. Metal casks, typically constructed from stainless steel or other high-integrity alloys, are favored for their superior mechanical strength, radiation shielding, and corrosion resistance. These attributes make metal casks particularly suitable for long-term storage and transportation, especially in regions with stringent seismic and safety requirements. Utility operators often prefer metal casks for their proven track record in maintaining containment integrity over extended periods, even under adverse environmental conditions. The demand for metal casks is further bolstered by ongoing reactor decommissioning projects and the need for flexible, transportable storage solutions.

Concrete casks represent another prominent segment, widely adopted for on-site storage applications due to their cost-effectiveness and robust radiation shielding capabilities. Concrete casks are typically designed as monolithic structures with thick reinforced walls, providing substantial protection against both external hazards and radioactive emissions. Their modular nature allows for scalable deployment, accommodating varying quantities of spent fuel as storage requirements evolve. Utilities in Europe and North America have increasingly turned to concrete casks for interim storage, leveraging their ability to safely store large volumes of spent fuel at decommissioned reactor sites. The segment continues to benefit from advancements in concrete formulation and construction techniques, which enhance durability and reduce maintenance needs.

Dual-purpose casks are gaining significant traction, driven by their versatility in both storage and transportation. These casks are engineered to meet regulatory requirements for both static and dynamic conditions, enabling utilities to streamline logistics and reduce overall handling costs. Dual-purpose casks are particularly valuable in scenarios where spent fuel must be moved from reactor sites to centralized interim storage facilities or permanent repositories. Their adoption is rising in markets where regulatory uncertainty regarding repository timelines has created a need for flexible, multi-functional storage solutions. Leading manufacturers are investing in the development of next-generation dual-purpose casks with enhanced safety features, such as advanced monitoring systems and improved heat dissipation capabilities.

The “others” category encompasses a range of specialized cask designs tailored for unique applications, such as high-burnup fuel, damaged fuel assemblies, or research reactor waste. These casks often incorporate custom features to address specific safety, security, or handling requirements. While representing a smaller share of the overall market, this segment is expected to grow as nuclear operators seek bespoke solutions for complex waste streams and as regulatory standards continue to evolve. The increasing emphasis on lifecycle management, coupled with the need to accommodate diverse fuel types and waste forms, is driving innovation in specialized cask design and engineering.

Overall, the cask type segment remains highly dynamic, with ongoing R&D investments focused on enhancing safety, scalability, and cost efficiency. Market participants are increasingly collaborating with regulatory agencies, research institutions, and utility operators to develop cask solutions that not only meet current needs but also anticipate future challenges in spent fuel management. As the global nuclear landscape evolves, the demand for advanced cask types is expected to remain robust, underpinning sustained growth across all major segments.

Report Scope

Attributes Details
Report Title Spent Nuclear Fuel Dry Storage Cask Market Research Report 2033
By Cask Type Metal Casks, Concrete Casks, Dual-Purpose Casks, Others
By Storage Type On-Site Storage, Off-Site Storage
By Material Stainless Steel, Concrete, Others
By Application Nuclear Power Plants, Research Reactors, Others
Regions Covered North America, Europe, APAC, Latin America, MEA
Base Year 2024
Historic Data 2018-2023
Forecast Period 2025-2033
Number of Pages 281
Number of Tables & Figures 389
Customization Available Yes, the report can be customized as per your need.

Storage Type Analysis

The spent nuclear fuel dry storage cask market is further segmented by storage type into on-site storage and off-site storage, each playing a pivotal role in the overall waste management strategy of nuclear facilities. On-site storage remains the most prevalent approach, particularly in countries where permanent disposal solutions are still under development or face regulatory delays. Utilities favor on-site storage due to its logistical simplicity, cost-effectiveness, and the ability to leverage existing infrastructure at reactor sites. On-site dry storage casks are typically deployed in secure, monitored facilities designed to withstand natural disasters, sabotage, and other external threats. The growing inventory of spent fuel at operating and decommissioned reactors, especially in North America and Europe, continues to drive demand for on-site storage solutions.

Off-site storage, while representing a smaller share of the market, is gaining importance as countries seek to centralize spent fuel management and optimize resource allocation. Centralized interim storage facilities offer economies of scale, enhanced security, and streamlined regulatory oversight, making them attractive options for national nuclear waste programs. Off-site storage is particularly relevant in regions with multiple reactors or where space constraints at reactor sites limit the feasibility of long-term on-site storage. The United States, for instance, is actively exploring consolidated interim storage as a bridge solution until a permanent repository becomes available. The development of off-site storage infrastructure requires significant investment in transportation logistics, regulatory compliance, and community engagement, factors that are shaping the future trajectory of this segment.

The choice between on-site and off-site storage is influenced by a range of factors, including regulatory frameworks, public acceptance, site-specific risk assessments, and the status of national waste disposal programs. Utilities must balance the need for immediate, secure containment with long-term strategic considerations, such as repository readiness and transportation logistics. In markets where regulatory uncertainty prevails, utilities often opt for modular on-site storage systems that can be expanded or reconfigured as needed. Conversely, countries with advanced waste management policies and centralized planning are investing in large-scale off-site facilities designed to accommodate diverse waste streams from multiple sources.

Technological advancements are playing a crucial role in enhancing the safety and efficiency of both on-site and off-site storage solutions. Innovations in cask monitoring, remote handling, and security systems are enabling utilities to maintain real-time oversight of stored fuel, detect anomalies early, and respond swiftly to potential threats. The integration of digital technologies, such as IoT-based sensors and predictive analytics, is further improving operational transparency and regulatory compliance. These advancements are particularly important in off-site storage scenarios, where the scale and complexity of operations necessitate robust monitoring and control systems.

As the global inventory of spent nuclear fuel continues to grow, the interplay between on-site and off-site storage solutions will remain a critical focus for policymakers, utilities, and technology providers. The evolving regulatory landscape, coupled with increasing public scrutiny and the imperative for long-term environmental stewardship, will drive continued investment and innovation in both segments. Ultimately, the ability to provide safe, secure, and adaptable storage options will be a key determinant of success in the spent nuclear fuel dry storage cask market.

Material Analysis

Material selection is a critical factor in the design and performance of spent nuclear fuel dry storage casks, with stainless steel, concrete, and other specialized materials forming the backbone of the market. Stainless steel is widely regarded for its exceptional mechanical strength, corrosion resistance, and ability to maintain structural integrity under high-radiation environments. These properties make stainless steel the material of choice for inner canisters and structural components of both metal and dual-purpose casks. The use of advanced alloys and surface treatments further enhances the durability and longevity of stainless steel casks, reducing maintenance requirements and ensuring compliance with stringent safety standards. As regulatory agencies continue to raise the bar for containment performance, demand for high-grade stainless steel solutions is expected to remain strong.

Concrete is another dominant material, particularly in the construction of monolithic casks and storage modules. Its inherent radiation shielding capabilities, combined with cost-effectiveness and ease of fabrication, make concrete an attractive option for utilities seeking scalable storage solutions. Reinforced concrete structures are engineered to withstand extreme environmental conditions, including seismic events, flooding, and temperature fluctuations. Advances in concrete technology, such as the incorporation of high-density aggregates and fiber reinforcement, are further improving the performance and resilience of dry storage casks. The widespread adoption of concrete casks in Europe and North America is a testament to their reliability and adaptability in diverse operational settings.

The “others” category encompasses a range of specialized materials, including advanced composites, polymers, and hybrid structures designed to address specific safety or operational requirements. These materials are often used in the development of next-generation cask designs, where enhanced thermal management, reduced weight, or improved handling characteristics are desired. Research into novel materials, such as borated stainless steel or ceramic composites, is ongoing, with the aim of further enhancing the safety and efficiency of spent fuel storage. While currently representing a smaller share of the market, these innovative materials are expected to gain traction as utilities and regulators seek to address emerging challenges in nuclear waste management.

Material selection is closely linked to regulatory compliance, lifecycle cost considerations, and operational flexibility. Utilities must carefully evaluate the trade-offs between initial investment, long-term maintenance, and end-of-life disposal when selecting cask materials. The increasing focus on sustainability and environmental stewardship is also influencing material choices, with stakeholders seeking solutions that minimize environmental impact and facilitate eventual decommissioning or recycling. Collaboration between material science experts, cask manufacturers, and regulatory bodies is essential to ensure that new materials meet the rigorous demands of nuclear waste storage.

Overall, the material segment of the spent nuclear fuel dry storage cask market is characterized by ongoing innovation and a relentless pursuit of enhanced safety and performance. As the global inventory of spent fuel continues to grow and regulatory standards evolve, the demand for advanced materials capable of withstanding the rigors of long-term storage will remain a key driver of market growth. Companies that can successfully integrate cutting-edge material technologies into their cask designs will be well-positioned to capture a larger share of this dynamic and rapidly evolving market.

Application Analysis

The primary application segments for spent nuclear fuel dry storage casks are nuclear power plants, research reactors, and other specialized facilities, each with unique storage requirements and operational challenges. Nuclear power plants represent the largest application segment, accounting for the majority of global demand. As the backbone of the world’s nuclear energy infrastructure, power plants generate significant volumes of spent fuel that must be safely stored for decades. The increasing number of reactors reaching the end of their operational life, particularly in North America and Europe, is driving a surge in demand for dry storage casks. Utilities are investing heavily in interim storage solutions to manage legacy waste and comply with evolving regulatory mandates, ensuring the continued safe operation and eventual decommissioning of reactor sites.

Research reactors, while smaller in scale, present unique challenges due to the diversity of fuel types, burnup rates, and waste forms. These facilities play a critical role in scientific research, medical isotope production, and materials testing, generating a wide range of radioactive waste streams. The need for flexible, customizable storage solutions is paramount in this segment, as research reactors often handle smaller quantities of high-activity fuel with specific containment and handling requirements. Dry storage cask manufacturers are responding by developing specialized cask designs that cater to the unique needs of research institutions, ensuring compliance with international safety standards and facilitating cross-border collaboration in nuclear research.

The “others” application segment encompasses a variety of specialized facilities, including fuel reprocessing plants, waste management centers, and storage sites for damaged or high-burnup fuel. These facilities often require bespoke storage solutions tailored to the unique characteristics of the waste being managed. For example, damaged fuel assemblies may necessitate casks with enhanced containment features, while high-burnup fuel may require advanced thermal management systems to dissipate residual heat. The increasing complexity of nuclear waste streams, coupled with evolving regulatory requirements, is driving demand for innovative cask solutions in this segment.

The application landscape is further shaped by the evolving regulatory environment and the increasing emphasis on lifecycle management. Utilities and research institutions are under growing pressure to demonstrate robust waste management practices, maintain comprehensive records, and ensure the traceability of stored fuel. This has led to the adoption of advanced monitoring and data management systems, integrated directly into dry storage cask designs. The ability to provide real-time oversight and rapid response capabilities is becoming a key differentiator in the market, particularly in regions with stringent safety and security requirements.

As the global nuclear industry continues to evolve, the application segment of the spent nuclear fuel dry storage cask market will remain a focal point for innovation and investment. The need for safe, reliable, and adaptable storage solutions spans the entire nuclear lifecycle, from power generation to research and waste management. Companies that can effectively address the diverse and evolving needs of these application segments will be well-positioned to capitalize on the growing demand for advanced dry storage cask solutions worldwide.

Opportunities & Threats

The spent nuclear fuel dry storage cask market is replete with opportunities driven by the accelerating pace of nuclear power expansion, technological innovation, and evolving regulatory frameworks. The global shift towards low-carbon energy sources has positioned nuclear power as a vital component in the transition to a sustainable energy future. As more countries invest in new reactors and extend the operational life of existing facilities, the demand for safe, reliable spent fuel storage solutions will continue to rise. Technological advancements, such as the development of modular, transportable casks and the integration of digital monitoring systems, are creating new avenues for market growth. Additionally, the increasing adoption of public-private partnerships and government-backed funding programs is fostering a favorable investment climate, enabling companies to scale operations and expand their global footprint.

Emerging markets in Asia Pacific, the Middle East, and Latin America present significant growth opportunities for dry storage cask manufacturers and service providers. These regions are witnessing a surge in nuclear power development, driven by rising energy demand, economic growth, and a desire to diversify energy portfolios. The establishment of new nuclear facilities and the expansion of existing ones are creating substantial demand for advanced storage solutions. Furthermore, the ongoing decommissioning of aging reactors in mature markets, coupled with the need to manage legacy waste, is generating a steady stream of projects for cask suppliers. Companies that can offer innovative, cost-effective solutions tailored to the unique needs of these diverse markets will be well-positioned to capture a larger share of the global spent nuclear fuel dry storage cask market.

Despite these opportunities, the market faces several restraining factors that could impede growth. Chief among these is the persistent uncertainty surrounding the development of permanent geological repositories for high-level radioactive waste. Delays in repository siting, licensing, and construction have forced utilities to rely on interim storage solutions for longer than initially anticipated, raising concerns about the long-term safety and security of dry storage casks. Additionally, the high cost of cask procurement, installation, and maintenance can strain utility budgets, particularly in regions with limited financial resources. Stringent regulatory requirements, public opposition to nuclear waste facilities, and the complex logistics of spent fuel transportation further compound these challenges. Addressing these restrainers will require sustained collaboration between industry stakeholders, governments, and the public to build trust, streamline regulatory processes, and ensure the safe, secure management of spent nuclear fuel.

Regional Outlook

North America remains the leading regional market for spent nuclear fuel dry storage casks, with the United States alone accounting for an estimated USD 630 million in revenue in 2024. This dominance is attributable to the region’s large fleet of commercial reactors, the ongoing decommissioning of aging plants, and the absence of a permanent federal repository for high-level waste. Utilities across the United States and Canada are investing heavily in dry storage solutions to safely manage growing inventories of spent fuel. The regulatory environment in North America is characterized by stringent safety standards and robust oversight, driving demand for advanced cask designs and comprehensive monitoring systems. The region is expected to maintain a steady growth rate, with a projected CAGR of 5.2% through 2033, as utilities continue to prioritize interim storage while awaiting the development of long-term disposal solutions.

Europe represents another major market, with an estimated value of USD 480 million in 2024. The region’s market dynamics are shaped by a combination of factors, including the decommissioning of older reactors, the expansion of interim storage capacity, and the implementation of harmonized regulatory frameworks under the European Union’s directives. Countries such as France, Germany, and the United Kingdom are at the forefront of dry storage cask adoption, driven by the need to manage legacy waste and comply with stringent environmental and safety standards. The European market is also characterized by significant investment in research and development, with a focus on enhancing cask performance, safety, and lifecycle management. As more reactors reach the end of their operational life and the transition to renewable energy accelerates, demand for dry storage solutions in Europe is expected to remain strong.

The Asia Pacific region is poised for the fastest growth, with the market valued at approximately USD 420 million in 2024 and a projected CAGR of 7.1% through 2033. This rapid expansion is driven by ambitious nuclear power development programs in China, India, South Korea, and other emerging economies. The construction of new reactors, coupled with the need to manage spent fuel from existing facilities, is creating substantial demand for advanced dry storage casks. Governments in the region are investing in the development of centralized interim storage facilities and are actively seeking international partnerships to enhance their waste management capabilities. The Middle East and Latin America, while currently representing smaller market shares, are expected to witness gradual growth as nuclear power adoption increases and regulatory frameworks mature. Collectively, these regions are contributing to the diversification and globalization of the spent nuclear fuel dry storage cask market.

Spent Nuclear Fuel Dry Storage Cask Market Statistics

Competitor Outlook

The competitive landscape of the spent nuclear fuel dry storage cask market is characterized by a mix of established industry leaders and emerging players, each vying for market share through innovation, strategic partnerships, and global expansion. Major companies in the sector have built strong reputations based on decades of experience, extensive product portfolios, and a proven track record of successful project delivery. These industry leaders leverage their technical expertise, manufacturing capabilities, and regulatory know-how to develop advanced cask designs that meet the evolving needs of utilities and regulatory agencies worldwide. The market is also witnessing increased collaboration between cask manufacturers, engineering firms, and research institutions, aimed at driving innovation and addressing emerging challenges in spent fuel management.

Competition in the market is further intensified by the growing emphasis on customization, lifecycle management, and value-added services. Leading companies are differentiating themselves by offering comprehensive solutions that encompass cask design, fabrication, installation, monitoring, and maintenance. The integration of digital technologies, such as IoT-based monitoring systems and predictive analytics, is becoming a key competitive differentiator, enabling companies to provide enhanced safety, operational transparency, and regulatory compliance. As utilities seek to optimize storage capacity, reduce costs, and extend the operational lifespan of their storage systems, demand for turnkey solutions and long-term service agreements is on the rise.

The market is also witnessing the entry of new players, particularly in emerging regions where nuclear power development is accelerating. These companies are leveraging local expertise, cost advantages, and partnerships with international technology providers to capture market share. The increasing focus on sustainability, environmental stewardship, and community engagement is driving demand for innovative cask solutions that minimize environmental impact and facilitate eventual decommissioning or recycling. As regulatory standards continue to evolve and public scrutiny intensifies, companies that can demonstrate a commitment to safety, transparency, and stakeholder engagement will be best positioned to succeed in this highly competitive market.

Some of the major companies operating in the global spent nuclear fuel dry storage cask market include Holtec International, Orano Group, NAC International, Hitachi Zosen Corporation, AREVA NP, and GNS Gesellschaft für Nuklear-Service mbH. Holtec International is renowned for its HI-STORM and HI-STAR cask systems, which are widely deployed in North America and internationally for both storage and transportation applications. Orano Group, formerly known as AREVA, offers a comprehensive range of dry storage and transportation solutions, with a strong presence in Europe and Asia. NAC International specializes in dual-purpose cask systems and provides integrated waste management services to utilities worldwide. Hitachi Zosen Corporation is a leading supplier of concrete and metal cask solutions in the Asia Pacific region, leveraging its manufacturing expertise and strong regional presence.

AREVA NP, now a part of Framatome and Orano, continues to be a major player in the European market, offering advanced cask designs and lifecycle management services. GNS Gesellschaft für Nuklear-Service mbH is a key supplier of dry storage systems in Germany and other European countries, with a focus on modular, scalable solutions for both on-site and centralized storage applications. These companies are continuously investing in research and development, strategic partnerships, and global expansion to maintain their competitive edge and address the evolving needs of the nuclear industry. As the global market for spent nuclear fuel dry storage casks continues to expand, competition is expected to intensify, driving further innovation and consolidation in the sector.

Key Players

  • Orano
  • Holtec International
  • NAC International
  • Hitachi Zosen Corporation
  • Mitsubishi Heavy Industries
  • Areva NP
  • GNS Gesellschaft für Nuklear-Service mbH
  • Westinghouse Electric Company
  • Babcock & Wilcox
  • ENSA (Equipos Nucleares S.A.)
  • Cimarron
  • Transnuclear, Inc.
  • EnergySolutions
  • SNC-Lavalin (Candu Energy)
  • AFC Energy
  • China National Nuclear Corporation (CNNC)
  • Korea Radioactive Waste Agency (KORAD)
  • Rosatom
  • Studsvik AB
  • Nuclear Fuel Services, Inc.
  • Toshiba Energy Systems & Solutions Corporation
Spent Nuclear Fuel Dry Storage Cask Market Overview

Segments

The Spent Nuclear Fuel Dry Storage Cask market has been segmented on the basis of

Cask Type

  • Metal Casks
  • Concrete Casks
  • Dual-Purpose Casks
  • Others

Storage Type

  • On-Site Storage
  • Off-Site Storage

Material

  • Stainless Steel
  • Concrete
  • Others

Application

  • Nuclear Power Plants
  • Research Reactors
  • Others

Competitive Landscape

  • Key players in the market include EnergySolutions, Holtec International, ŠKODA JS a.s., GNS Gesellschaft für, Nuklear-Service mbH, and Hitachi Zosen Corporation. These companies are considered as key manufacturers of spent nuclear fuel dry storage cask based on their revenue, research & development (R&D) activities, regional presence, and supply chain management system.

  • The players are adopting key strategies such as acquisition, and geographical expansion where potential opportunity for the spent nuclear fuel dry storage cask extraction is added in the company’s capacity.

  • For instance, In December 2019, Orano announced that it signed a contract worth euros 40 million with ECP, which is a subsidiary of Rosatom. The contract enabled Orano to receive a project for the depleted uranium plant, which is located Zelenogorsk in Russia.

  •  In December 2017, EnergySolutions acquired PHTS Logistics Inc. which is located in Ontario, Canada. PHTS Logistics Inc. is one of the leaders in truckload and less than truckload logistics services in Canada.

  • In August 2019, Holtec International’s subsidiaries completed the acquisition of the Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station, which is located in Massachusetts, the US from Entergy Corporation.

Spent Nuclear Fuel Dry Storage Cask Market Keyplayers

Frequently Asked Questions

Major Manufactures include, EnergySolutions, Holtec International, ŠKODA JS a.s., GNS Gesellschaft für, Nuklear-Service mbH, and Hitachi Zosen Corporation.

Large nuclear power plants and small nuclear power plants are the key end-user that are driving the Spent Nuclear Fuel Dry Storage Cask market.

The base year considered for the global spent nuclear fuel dry storage cask market report is 2019. The complete analysis period is 2017 to 2027, wherein, 2017 & 2018 are the historic years and the forecast is provided from 2020 to 2027.

The market is expected to witness increment of over 2.8% between 2019 and 2020 owing to the positive impact of COVID-19 pandemic on the Spent Nuclear Fuel Dry Storage Cask market.

Factors such as competitive strength and market positioning are key areas considered while selecting top companies to be profiled.

The rising uses of nuclear technology, the need to reduce greenhouse gas emissions are driving nations to develop nuclear power plants, and rising fossil fuel prices and energy scarcity are expected to increase global adoption of nuclear energy during the forecast period to drive market growth.

In addition to market size (in US$ Million) and Volume in (Tons) Company Market Share (in % for base year 2019), other data such Macro-economic factors, COVID-19 Impact on the Nuclear Power Value Chain is available in final report.

According to this Growth Market Reports report, the market from spent nuclear fuel dry storage cask is likely to register a CAGR of 6.9% during forecast period 2020-2027, with an anticipated valuation of US$ 2,739.6 million by the end of the 2027.

Yes, the report covers product specific information such as concrete cask, metal cask, etc.

Yes, the report gives the list of nuclear license regulatory in different countries.

Additional company profiles can be provided on request.

Table Of Content

Chapter 1 Executive Summary
Chapter 2 Assumptions and Acronyms Used
Chapter 3 Research Methodology
Chapter 4 Spent Nuclear Fuel Dry Storage Cask Market Overview
   4.1 Introduction
      4.1.1 Market Taxonomy
      4.1.2 Market Definition
      4.1.3 Macro-Economic Factors Impacting the Market Growth
   4.2 Spent Nuclear Fuel Dry Storage Cask Market Dynamics
      4.2.1 Market Drivers
      4.2.2 Market Restraints
      4.2.3 Market Opportunity
   4.3 Spent Nuclear Fuel Dry Storage Cask Market - Supply Chain Analysis
      4.3.1 List of Key Suppliers
      4.3.2 List of Key Distributors
      4.3.3 List of Key Consumers
   4.4 Key Forces Shaping the Spent Nuclear Fuel Dry Storage Cask Market
      4.4.1 Bargaining Power of Suppliers
      4.4.2 Bargaining Power of Buyers
      4.4.3 Threat of Substitution
      4.4.4 Threat of New Entrants
      4.4.5 Competitive Rivalry
   4.5 Global Spent Nuclear Fuel Dry Storage Cask Market Size & Forecast, 2023-2032
      4.5.1 Spent Nuclear Fuel Dry Storage Cask Market Size and Y-o-Y Growth
      4.5.2 Spent Nuclear Fuel Dry Storage Cask Market Absolute $ Opportunity

Chapter 5 Global Spent Nuclear Fuel Dry Storage Cask Market Analysis and Forecast By Cask Type
   5.1 Introduction
      5.1.1 Key Market Trends & Growth Opportunities By Cask Type
      5.1.2 Basis Point Share (BPS) Analysis By Cask Type
      5.1.3 Absolute $ Opportunity Assessment By Cask Type
   5.2 Spent Nuclear Fuel Dry Storage Cask Market Size Forecast By Cask Type
      5.2.1 Metal Casks
      5.2.2 Concrete Casks
      5.2.3 Dual-Purpose Casks
      5.2.4 Others
   5.3 Market Attractiveness Analysis By Cask Type

Chapter 6 Global Spent Nuclear Fuel Dry Storage Cask Market Analysis and Forecast By Storage Type
   6.1 Introduction
      6.1.1 Key Market Trends & Growth Opportunities By Storage Type
      6.1.2 Basis Point Share (BPS) Analysis By Storage Type
      6.1.3 Absolute $ Opportunity Assessment By Storage Type
   6.2 Spent Nuclear Fuel Dry Storage Cask Market Size Forecast By Storage Type
      6.2.1 On-Site Storage
      6.2.2 Off-Site Storage
   6.3 Market Attractiveness Analysis By Storage Type

Chapter 7 Global Spent Nuclear Fuel Dry Storage Cask Market Analysis and Forecast By Material
   7.1 Introduction
      7.1.1 Key Market Trends & Growth Opportunities By Material
      7.1.2 Basis Point Share (BPS) Analysis By Material
      7.1.3 Absolute $ Opportunity Assessment By Material
   7.2 Spent Nuclear Fuel Dry Storage Cask Market Size Forecast By Material
      7.2.1 Stainless Steel
      7.2.2 Concrete
      7.2.3 Others
   7.3 Market Attractiveness Analysis By Material

Chapter 8 Global Spent Nuclear Fuel Dry Storage Cask Market Analysis and Forecast By Application
   8.1 Introduction
      8.1.1 Key Market Trends & Growth Opportunities By Application
      8.1.2 Basis Point Share (BPS) Analysis By Application
      8.1.3 Absolute $ Opportunity Assessment By Application
   8.2 Spent Nuclear Fuel Dry Storage Cask Market Size Forecast By Application
      8.2.1 Nuclear Power Plants
      8.2.2 Research Reactors
      8.2.3 Others
   8.3 Market Attractiveness Analysis By Application

Chapter 9 Global Spent Nuclear Fuel Dry Storage Cask Market Analysis and Forecast by Region
   9.1 Introduction
      9.1.1 Key Market Trends & Growth Opportunities By Region
      9.1.2 Basis Point Share (BPS) Analysis By Region
      9.1.3 Absolute $ Opportunity Assessment By Region
   9.2 Spent Nuclear Fuel Dry Storage Cask Market Size Forecast By Region
      9.2.1 North America
      9.2.2 Europe
      9.2.3 Asia Pacific
      9.2.4 Latin America
      9.2.5 Middle East & Africa (MEA)
   9.3 Market Attractiveness Analysis By Region

Chapter 10 Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) Impact 
   10.1 Introduction 
   10.2 Current & Future Impact Analysis 
   10.3 Economic Impact Analysis 
   10.4 Government Policies 
   10.5 Investment Scenario

Chapter 11 North America Spent Nuclear Fuel Dry Storage Cask Analysis and Forecast
   11.1 Introduction
   11.2 North America Spent Nuclear Fuel Dry Storage Cask Market Size Forecast by Country
      11.2.1 U.S.
      11.2.2 Canada
   11.3 Basis Point Share (BPS) Analysis by Country
   11.4 Absolute $ Opportunity Assessment by Country
   11.5 Market Attractiveness Analysis by Country
   11.6 North America Spent Nuclear Fuel Dry Storage Cask Market Size Forecast By Cask Type
      11.6.1 Metal Casks
      11.6.2 Concrete Casks
      11.6.3 Dual-Purpose Casks
      11.6.4 Others
   11.7 Basis Point Share (BPS) Analysis By Cask Type 
   11.8 Absolute $ Opportunity Assessment By Cask Type 
   11.9 Market Attractiveness Analysis By Cask Type
   11.10 North America Spent Nuclear Fuel Dry Storage Cask Market Size Forecast By Storage Type
      11.10.1 On-Site Storage
      11.10.2 Off-Site Storage
   11.11 Basis Point Share (BPS) Analysis By Storage Type 
   11.12 Absolute $ Opportunity Assessment By Storage Type 
   11.13 Market Attractiveness Analysis By Storage Type
   11.14 North America Spent Nuclear Fuel Dry Storage Cask Market Size Forecast By Material
      11.14.1 Stainless Steel
      11.14.2 Concrete
      11.14.3 Others
   11.15 Basis Point Share (BPS) Analysis By Material 
   11.16 Absolute $ Opportunity Assessment By Material 
   11.17 Market Attractiveness Analysis By Material
   11.18 North America Spent Nuclear Fuel Dry Storage Cask Market Size Forecast By Application
      11.18.1 Nuclear Power Plants
      11.18.2 Research Reactors
      11.18.3 Others
   11.19 Basis Point Share (BPS) Analysis By Application 
   11.20 Absolute $ Opportunity Assessment By Application 
   11.21 Market Attractiveness Analysis By Application

Chapter 12 Europe Spent Nuclear Fuel Dry Storage Cask Analysis and Forecast
   12.1 Introduction
   12.2 Europe Spent Nuclear Fuel Dry Storage Cask Market Size Forecast by Country
      12.2.1 Germany
      12.2.2 France
      12.2.3 Italy
      12.2.4 U.K.
      12.2.5 Spain
      12.2.6 Russia
      12.2.7 Rest of Europe
   12.3 Basis Point Share (BPS) Analysis by Country
   12.4 Absolute $ Opportunity Assessment by Country
   12.5 Market Attractiveness Analysis by Country
   12.6 Europe Spent Nuclear Fuel Dry Storage Cask Market Size Forecast By Cask Type
      12.6.1 Metal Casks
      12.6.2 Concrete Casks
      12.6.3 Dual-Purpose Casks
      12.6.4 Others
   12.7 Basis Point Share (BPS) Analysis By Cask Type 
   12.8 Absolute $ Opportunity Assessment By Cask Type 
   12.9 Market Attractiveness Analysis By Cask Type
   12.10 Europe Spent Nuclear Fuel Dry Storage Cask Market Size Forecast By Storage Type
      12.10.1 On-Site Storage
      12.10.2 Off-Site Storage
   12.11 Basis Point Share (BPS) Analysis By Storage Type 
   12.12 Absolute $ Opportunity Assessment By Storage Type 
   12.13 Market Attractiveness Analysis By Storage Type
   12.14 Europe Spent Nuclear Fuel Dry Storage Cask Market Size Forecast By Material
      12.14.1 Stainless Steel
      12.14.2 Concrete
      12.14.3 Others
   12.15 Basis Point Share (BPS) Analysis By Material 
   12.16 Absolute $ Opportunity Assessment By Material 
   12.17 Market Attractiveness Analysis By Material
   12.18 Europe Spent Nuclear Fuel Dry Storage Cask Market Size Forecast By Application
      12.18.1 Nuclear Power Plants
      12.18.2 Research Reactors
      12.18.3 Others
   12.19 Basis Point Share (BPS) Analysis By Application 
   12.20 Absolute $ Opportunity Assessment By Application 
   12.21 Market Attractiveness Analysis By Application

Chapter 13 Asia Pacific Spent Nuclear Fuel Dry Storage Cask Analysis and Forecast
   13.1 Introduction
   13.2 Asia Pacific Spent Nuclear Fuel Dry Storage Cask Market Size Forecast by Country
      13.2.1 China
      13.2.2 Japan
      13.2.3 South Korea
      13.2.4 India
      13.2.5 Australia
      13.2.6 South East Asia (SEA)
      13.2.7 Rest of Asia Pacific (APAC)
   13.3 Basis Point Share (BPS) Analysis by Country
   13.4 Absolute $ Opportunity Assessment by Country
   13.5 Market Attractiveness Analysis by Country
   13.6 Asia Pacific Spent Nuclear Fuel Dry Storage Cask Market Size Forecast By Cask Type
      13.6.1 Metal Casks
      13.6.2 Concrete Casks
      13.6.3 Dual-Purpose Casks
      13.6.4 Others
   13.7 Basis Point Share (BPS) Analysis By Cask Type 
   13.8 Absolute $ Opportunity Assessment By Cask Type 
   13.9 Market Attractiveness Analysis By Cask Type
   13.10 Asia Pacific Spent Nuclear Fuel Dry Storage Cask Market Size Forecast By Storage Type
      13.10.1 On-Site Storage
      13.10.2 Off-Site Storage
   13.11 Basis Point Share (BPS) Analysis By Storage Type 
   13.12 Absolute $ Opportunity Assessment By Storage Type 
   13.13 Market Attractiveness Analysis By Storage Type
   13.14 Asia Pacific Spent Nuclear Fuel Dry Storage Cask Market Size Forecast By Material
      13.14.1 Stainless Steel
      13.14.2 Concrete
      13.14.3 Others
   13.15 Basis Point Share (BPS) Analysis By Material 
   13.16 Absolute $ Opportunity Assessment By Material 
   13.17 Market Attractiveness Analysis By Material
   13.18 Asia Pacific Spent Nuclear Fuel Dry Storage Cask Market Size Forecast By Application
      13.18.1 Nuclear Power Plants
      13.18.2 Research Reactors
      13.18.3 Others
   13.19 Basis Point Share (BPS) Analysis By Application 
   13.20 Absolute $ Opportunity Assessment By Application 
   13.21 Market Attractiveness Analysis By Application

Chapter 14 Latin America Spent Nuclear Fuel Dry Storage Cask Analysis and Forecast
   14.1 Introduction
   14.2 Latin America Spent Nuclear Fuel Dry Storage Cask Market Size Forecast by Country
      14.2.1 Brazil
      14.2.2 Mexico
      14.2.3 Rest of Latin America (LATAM)
   14.3 Basis Point Share (BPS) Analysis by Country
   14.4 Absolute $ Opportunity Assessment by Country
   14.5 Market Attractiveness Analysis by Country
   14.6 Latin America Spent Nuclear Fuel Dry Storage Cask Market Size Forecast By Cask Type
      14.6.1 Metal Casks
      14.6.2 Concrete Casks
      14.6.3 Dual-Purpose Casks
      14.6.4 Others
   14.7 Basis Point Share (BPS) Analysis By Cask Type 
   14.8 Absolute $ Opportunity Assessment By Cask Type 
   14.9 Market Attractiveness Analysis By Cask Type
   14.10 Latin America Spent Nuclear Fuel Dry Storage Cask Market Size Forecast By Storage Type
      14.10.1 On-Site Storage
      14.10.2 Off-Site Storage
   14.11 Basis Point Share (BPS) Analysis By Storage Type 
   14.12 Absolute $ Opportunity Assessment By Storage Type 
   14.13 Market Attractiveness Analysis By Storage Type
   14.14 Latin America Spent Nuclear Fuel Dry Storage Cask Market Size Forecast By Material
      14.14.1 Stainless Steel
      14.14.2 Concrete
      14.14.3 Others
   14.15 Basis Point Share (BPS) Analysis By Material 
   14.16 Absolute $ Opportunity Assessment By Material 
   14.17 Market Attractiveness Analysis By Material
   14.18 Latin America Spent Nuclear Fuel Dry Storage Cask Market Size Forecast By Application
      14.18.1 Nuclear Power Plants
      14.18.2 Research Reactors
      14.18.3 Others
   14.19 Basis Point Share (BPS) Analysis By Application 
   14.20 Absolute $ Opportunity Assessment By Application 
   14.21 Market Attractiveness Analysis By Application

Chapter 15 Middle East & Africa (MEA) Spent Nuclear Fuel Dry Storage Cask Analysis and Forecast
   15.1 Introduction
   15.2 Middle East & Africa (MEA) Spent Nuclear Fuel Dry Storage Cask Market Size Forecast by Country
      15.2.1 Saudi Arabia
      15.2.2 South Africa
      15.2.3 UAE
      15.2.4 Rest of Middle East & Africa (MEA)
   15.3 Basis Point Share (BPS) Analysis by Country
   15.4 Absolute $ Opportunity Assessment by Country
   15.5 Market Attractiveness Analysis by Country
   15.6 Middle East & Africa (MEA) Spent Nuclear Fuel Dry Storage Cask Market Size Forecast By Cask Type
      15.6.1 Metal Casks
      15.6.2 Concrete Casks
      15.6.3 Dual-Purpose Casks
      15.6.4 Others
   15.7 Basis Point Share (BPS) Analysis By Cask Type 
   15.8 Absolute $ Opportunity Assessment By Cask Type 
   15.9 Market Attractiveness Analysis By Cask Type
   15.10 Middle East & Africa (MEA) Spent Nuclear Fuel Dry Storage Cask Market Size Forecast By Storage Type
      15.10.1 On-Site Storage
      15.10.2 Off-Site Storage
   15.11 Basis Point Share (BPS) Analysis By Storage Type 
   15.12 Absolute $ Opportunity Assessment By Storage Type 
   15.13 Market Attractiveness Analysis By Storage Type
   15.14 Middle East & Africa (MEA) Spent Nuclear Fuel Dry Storage Cask Market Size Forecast By Material
      15.14.1 Stainless Steel
      15.14.2 Concrete
      15.14.3 Others
   15.15 Basis Point Share (BPS) Analysis By Material 
   15.16 Absolute $ Opportunity Assessment By Material 
   15.17 Market Attractiveness Analysis By Material
   15.18 Middle East & Africa (MEA) Spent Nuclear Fuel Dry Storage Cask Market Size Forecast By Application
      15.18.1 Nuclear Power Plants
      15.18.2 Research Reactors
      15.18.3 Others
   15.19 Basis Point Share (BPS) Analysis By Application 
   15.20 Absolute $ Opportunity Assessment By Application 
   15.21 Market Attractiveness Analysis By Application

Chapter 16 Competition Landscape 
   16.1 Spent Nuclear Fuel Dry Storage Cask Market: Competitive Dashboard
   16.2 Global Spent Nuclear Fuel Dry Storage Cask Market: Market Share Analysis, 2023
   16.3 Company Profiles (Details – Overview, Financials, Developments, Strategy) 
      16.3.1 Orano
Holtec International
NAC International
Hitachi Zosen Corporation
Mitsubishi Heavy Industries
Areva NP
GNS Gesellschaft für Nuklear-Service mbH
Westinghouse Electric Company
Babcock & Wilcox
ENSA (Equipos Nucleares S.A.)
Cimarron
Transnuclear, Inc.
EnergySolutions
SNC-Lavalin (Candu Energy)
AFC Energy
China National Nuclear Corporation (CNNC)
Korea Radioactive Waste Agency (KORAD)
Rosatom
Studsvik AB
Nuclear Fuel Services, Inc.
Toshiba Energy Systems & Solutions Corporation

Methodology

Our Clients

Siemens Healthcare
General Mills
Nestle SA
FedEx Logistics
sinopec
General Electric
Deloitte
The John Holland Group